Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information	Sep. 30, 2015	Nov. 13, 2015
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Lifelogger Technologies Corp
Entity Central Index Key	0001567771
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		82,430,503
Trading Symbol	LOGG
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015

Balance Sheets

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current Assets:
Cash	$ 142,850	$ 238,747
Accounts Receivable		93,021
Prepaid expenses	3,124	14,246
Deferred financing costs	4,702
Total current assets	150,676	346,014
Furniture and Fixtures
Furniture and fixtures	9,578	9,246
Accumulated depreciation	(1,026)
Furniture and fixtures, net	8,552	9,246
Total Assets	159,228	355,260
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	68,293	38,132
Note payable	135,000
Note payable, net of unamortized discount of $257,233	16,451
Derivative liablity - warrants	133,850
Total current liabilities	353,594	38,132
Total liabilities	353,594	38,132
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Preferred stock par value $0.001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; None issued or outstanding
Common stock par value $0.001: 120,000,000 shares authorized; 82,430,503 and 81,841,666 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	82,431	81,842
Additional paid-in capital	814,652	477,535
Accumulated deficit	(1,091,449)	(242,249)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	(194,366)	317,128
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$ 159,228	$ 355,260

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Note payable, unamortized discount	$ 257,233
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	120,000,000	120,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	82,430,503	81,841,666
Common stock, shares outstanding	82,430,503	81,841,666

Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenue		$ 92,000		$ 272,000
Cost of revenue
Production costs		39,000		89,000
Officers		5,033		14,458
Total cost of revenue		44,033		103,458
Gross margin		47,967		168,542
Operating Expenses:
Research and development	116,629		367,856
Advertising and promotions	817	711	10,830	32,976
Consulting -related parties	34,114	28,517	169,727	81,927
Consulting - other	37,769	14,320	189,450	40,520
General and administrative	63,725	22,190	127,950	79,442
Total operating expenses	253,054	65,738	865,813	234,865
Loss from operations	(253,054)	(17,771)	(865,813)	(66,323)
Other income and (expenses)
Change in fair value of derivatives	35,420		35,420	0
Interest expense	(18,807)		(18,807)	0
Total other income	16,613		16,613
Net loss before income tax provision	(236,441)	(17,771)	(849,200)	(66,323)
Income tax provision		456		456
Net Loss	$ (236,441)	$ (18,227)	$ (849,200)	$ (66,779)
Net Loss Per Common Share:
- Basic and Diluted	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ (0.01)	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
- Basic and Diluted	83,590,543	81,000,000	83,041,927	81,000,000

Statement of Change in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited)

Statement of Change in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) (USD $)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]	Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 81,000	$ (26,623)	$ (56,366)	$ (1,989)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2013	81,000,000
Common stock issued for cash, at $0.60 per share	842	504,158		505,000
Common stock issued for cash, at $0.60 per share, shares	841,666
Net loss			(185,883)	(185,883)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2014	81,842	477,535	(242,249)	317,128
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2014	81,841,666
Common stock issued for cash, at $0.43 per share	349	149,651		150,000
Common stock issued for cash, at $0.43 per share, shares	348,837
Common stock issued for services	240	106,736		106,976
Common stock issued for services, shares	240,000
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt issued		80,730		80,730
Net loss			(849,200)	(849,200)
Balance at Sep. 30, 2015	$ 82,431	$ 814,652	$ (1,091,449)	$ (194,366)
Balance, shares at Sep. 30, 2015	82,430,503

Statement of Change in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) (Parenthetical)

Statement of Change in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	May 12, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Common stock price per share	$ 0.43	$ 0.43	$ 0.60

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$ (849,200)	$ (66,779)
Depreciation expenses	1,026
Shares issued for consulting services	106,976
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts receivable	93,021	(15,000)
Prepaid expenses	11,122	(1,767)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	30,161	80,505
Accrued compensation - officers		1,333
Interest expense recognized through accretion of discount on debt	16,451
Interest expense recognized through amortization of deferred financing costs	298
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	(35,420)	0
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(625,565)	(1,708)
Investing Activities:
Purchase of Fixed Assets	(332)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(332)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	150,000	250,000
Proceeds from note payable	380,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	530,000	250,000
Net Change in Cash	(95,897)	248,292
Cash - Beginning of Reporting Period	238,747	255
Cash - End of Reporting Period	142,850	248,747
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid
Income Tax Paid		456
Non Cash Financing and Investing Activities:
Forgiveness of debt from former stockholder and officer - accrued compensation
Forgiveness of debt from former stockholder and officer - advances from stockholder

Organization and Operations

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization and Operations

Note 1 - organization and operations

Lifelogger Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 4, 2012 under the name Snap Online Marketing Inc. The Company changed its name effective as of January 31, 2014 and is engaged in the development and commercialization of a lifelogging camera and lifelogging-focused software tools that involve the process of collecting, organizing, perusing and sharing personal data.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for organization, consolidation and basis of presentation of financial statements disclosure.

+ References+ Details

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2 - summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2015.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into Six (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The Six (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

The Company includes fair value information in the notes to financial statements when the fair value of its financial instruments is different from the book value. When the book value approximates fair value, no additional disclosure is made.

Valuation of Derivatives

The Company evaluates its convertible instruments, options, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date. The change in fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as other income (expense). Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification under ASC Topic 815 are reclassified to liabilities at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. We analyzed the derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815. The objective is to provide guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. This determination is needed for a scope exception which would enable a derivative instrument to be accounted for under the accrual method. The classification of a non-derivative instrument that falls within the scope of ASC 815-40-05 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” also hinges on whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. A non-derivative instrument that is not indexed to an entity’s own stock cannot be classified as equity and must be accounted for as a liability. There is a two-step approach in determining whether an instrument or embedded feature is indexed to an entity’s own stock. First, the instrument’s contingent exercise provisions, if any, must be evaluated, followed by an evaluation of the instrument’s settlement provisions. The Company utilized multinomial lattice models that value the derivative liability based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. The Company utilized the fair value standard set forth by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, defined as the amount at which the assets (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.

The derivative liabilities result in a reduction of the initial carrying amount (as unamortized discount) of the Convertible Notes. This derivative liability is marked-to-market each quarter with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement. Unamortized discount is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the Convertible Note.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay.

Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Furniture and Fixtures

Furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

Estimated

Useful Life

(Years)

Furniture and fixture

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include: a. affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825-10-15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. a amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customers; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:

a.	The exercise price of the option.

b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

c.	The current price of the underlying share.

d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.

e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Research and Development

The Company follows paragraph 730-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 “Accounting for Research and Development Costs” ) and paragraph 730-20-25-11 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 68 “Research and Development Arrangements” ) for research and development costs. Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development costs consist primarily of remuneration for research and development staff, depreciation and maintenance expenses of research and development equipment, material and testing costs for research and development as well as research and development arrangements with unrelated third party research and development institutions.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions

The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.

Earnings per Share

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260-10-55-23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the reporting year ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

1.	Identify the contract(s) with the customer

2.	Identify the performance obligations in the contract

3.	Determine the transaction price

4.	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

5.	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

1.	Contracts with customers - including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

2.	Significant judgments and changes in judgments - determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations.

3.	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).

The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted and the Company has elected to implement the guidance in its quarter ended September 30, 2014.

In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)

b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) : Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”). The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrument as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) : Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”). This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

In February 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) -Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”) to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).

All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

●	Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.

●	Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).

●	Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.

●	Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.

●	Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity.

+ References+ Details

Going Concern

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Going Concern

Going Concern

Note 3 - Going Concern

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”) .

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2015, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, its cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note Payable

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Note Payable

Note 4 – Note Payable

On July 20, 2015 the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Glamis Capital SA (“Glamis”), whereby Glamis agreed to invest $200,000 (the “Purchase Price”) in our Company in exchange for the Note (as defined below). Pursuant to the SPA, we issued a promissory note to Glamis on July 20, 2015 (the “Issuance Date”) in the original principal amount of $200,000.00, which bears interest at 10% per annum (the “Note”).

The Purchase Price for the Note was paid as follows: (1) $70,000 on the Issuance Date and $65,000 on August 24, 2015. The principal from each funding date, coupled with the accrued and unpaid interest relating to that principal amount, is due and payable one year from the respective funding date (each a “Maturity Date”). Any amount of principal or interest that is due under the Note, which is not paid by the respective Maturity Date, will bear interest at 14% per annum until it is paid. The Note can be prepaid by the Company at any time while the Note is outstanding. In the event that the Company closes a future financing of at least $1,000,000 while the Note is outstanding, the Company would become obligated to pay all amounts outstanding under the Note within a reasonable time after such closing. The SPA and Note were amended on November 12, 2015. See Note 10- Subsequent Events.

Derivative Liability

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Derivative Instrument Detail [Abstract]

Derivative Liability

Note 5 – Derivative Liability

In connection with the sale of debt or equity instruments, the Company may sell options or warrants to purchase our common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants may be classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as embedded derivative features which in certain circumstances may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

The Company’s derivative instrument liabilities are re-valued at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded as charges or credits to income in the period in which the changes occur. For options, warrants and bifurcated embedded derivative features that are accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, the Company estimates fair value using either quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or other valuation techniques. The valuation techniques require assumptions related to the remaining term of the instruments and risk-free rates of return, our current common stock price and expected dividend yield, and the expected volatility of our common stock price over the life of the option.

The following table summarizes the warrant liabilities derivative activity for the period ending September 30, 2015:

Description	Warrant Liabilities
Fair value at June 30, 2015	$	-
Change due to Issuances		169,270
Change due to Exercise/Conversion		-
Change in Fair Value		(35,420	)
Fair value at September 30, 2015	$	133,850

For the period ended September 30, 2015, net derivative income was $35,420.

The lattice methodology was used to value the warrants issued, with the following assumptions.

Assumptions	September 30, 2015
Dividend yield		0.00	%
Risk-free rate for term		1.37	%
Volatility		106.4	%
Maturity dates		4.9 years
Stock Price		0.2125

During the period ending September 30, 2015, the Company issued 850,000 warrants to an investor as part of their Securities Purchase Agreement in which the investor acquired a Convertible Note. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.2625 and a five year term. The warrants are treated as derivative liabilities since the holder has anti-dilution protections that will re-price the warrant upon the issuance of lower priced equity linked instruments by the Company for the period of 180 days after issuance. The fair value of the derivative liability related to these warrants at issuance was valued at $169,270 was expensed booked as a debt discount to the Convertible Note and booked as a derivative liability on the balance sheet.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for derivative instruments and hedging activities including, but not limited to, risk management strategies, non-hedging derivative instruments, assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and methodologies and assumptions used in determining the amounts.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4A

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5618551-113959

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 1A

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5579245-113959

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4E

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5624181-113959

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4H

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5624258-113959

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 25

-Section 50

-Paragraph 1

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6886632&loc=d3e76258-113986

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4K

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5708775-113959

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=d3e41638-113959

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 30

-Section 50

-Paragraph 1

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=35736893&loc=d3e80748-113994

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4J

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5708773-113959

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 235

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 1

-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(n))

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=26873400&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 30

-Section 50

-Paragraph 2

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=35736893&loc=d3e80784-113994

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4D

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5624177-113959

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 2

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=d3e41620-113959

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 1B

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5580258-113959

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 30

-Section 45

-Paragraph 1

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6441202&loc=d3e80720-113993

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4C

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5624171-113959

Reference 17: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4B

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5624163-113959

Reference 18: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 1

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=SL5579240-113959

Reference 19: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 815

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 5

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=56946850&loc=d3e41641-113959

+ Details

Convertible Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Convertible Debt

Note 6 – Convertible Debt

Old Main Capital, LLC:

On September 14, 2015 (the “Issuance Date”), Lifelogger Technologies Corp. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or “Company”) closed on the transactions contemplated by the securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Old Main Capital, LLC (“Old Main”), whereby Old Main agreed to invest $450,000.00 (the “Purchase Price”) in our Company in exchange for the Note (as defined below) and Warrants (as defined below). Pursuant to the SPA, we issued a promissory note to Old Main, in the original principal amount of $473,864 with original issue discount of $23,864, which bears interest at 10% per annum (the “Note”). The Purchase Price will be paid as follows: (1) $250,000.00 paid in cash to us on the Issuance Date, (2) the remaining $200,000.00 within 30 days after the Issuance Date. The principal from each funding date, coupled with the accrued and unpaid interest relating to that principal amount, is due and payable on September 8, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). Any amount of principal or interest that is due under the Note, which is not paid by the Maturity Date, will bear interest at the rate of 24% per annum until it is paid.

Beginning 6 months after the Issuance Date, we are required to make bi-weekly amortization payments (one payment every 2 weeks), consisting of 1/12^th of the outstanding principal and interest, until the Note is on longer outstanding (each a “Bi-Weekly Payment”). Such Bi-Weekly Payments may be made in cash, or in our common stock (“Common Stock”) if certain equity conditions are satisfied. Such equity conditions include but are not limited to an average daily dollar volume of the Common Stock greater than $25,000 for the 20 trading days prior to a Bi-Weekly Payment. If the equity conditions are satisfied, and we decide to make a Bi-Weekly payment in Common Stock, then the shares of Common Stock to be delivered shall be calculated as follows: the amount of the Bi-Weekly Payment divided by the Base Conversion Price (as defined below). The Base Conversion Price shall equal the lower of (i) the closing price of the Common Stock on September 8, 2015, or (ii) 70% of the average of the lowest VWAP of the Common Stock for the 15 trading days immediately prior to the date of the Bi-Weekly Payment. Additionally, Old Main has the right at any time to convert amounts owed under the Note into Common Stock at the closing price of the Common Stock on September 8, 2015. If an event of default under the Note occurs, Old Main has the right to convert amounts owed under the Note into Common Stock at 52% multiplied by the lowest VWAP of the Common Stock for the 15 trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion date.

The Note can be prepaid by us at any time while the Note is outstanding, at a prepayment price of 125% multiplied by the outstanding principal and interest of the Note, subject to Old Main’s discretionary acceptance. If an event of default occurs under the Note, which is not cured within 10 business days, Old Main has the option to require our redemption of the Note in cash at a redemption price of 130% multiplied by the outstanding principal and interest of the Note. The Note contains representations, warranties, events of default, beneficial ownership limitations, and other provisions that are customary of similar instruments.

In conjunction with the issuance of the Note, we simultaneously issued 850,000 common stock purchase warrants to Old Main (the “Warrants”). The Warrants may be exercised by Old Main at any time in the 5 year period following the issuance. The exercise price for each share of the Common Stock is equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on September 8, 2015.

Following is an analysis of convertible debt due Old Main Capital at September 30, 2015:

	September 30, 2015
Contractual balance	$	273,684
Less unamortized discount		(257,223	)

Convertible debt	$	16,451

This note is contain a beneficial conversion feature. The Company recorded a debt discount based on the original issue discount, the derivative warrant issued, and the beneficial conversion feature in the note discount ($273,684 at issuance). The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the convertible debt.

Related Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions

Note 7 - Related Party Transactions

Related Parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Related Parties		Relationship

Stew Garner		Chairman, CEO, CFO and director

Indra Dosanjh		Chief Product Officer of the Company

Consulting services from Officer

Consulting services provided by the officer for the period from the Nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2015		For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2014

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer	$	94,727	$	96,385	*

Chief Product Officer		75,000		-
	$	169,727	$	96,385

*During the nine month period ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, $0 and $9,425 of these consulting services was recognized in cost of revenues, respectively.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners; and (d) affiliates.

+ References+ Details

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Disclosure Text Block [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Note 8 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and convertible debt. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company utilizes various types of financing to fund its business needs, including convertible debt with warrants attached. The Company reviews its warrants and conversion features of securities issued as to whether they are freestanding or contain an embedded derivative and, if so, whether they are classified as a liability at each reporting period until the amount is settled and reclassified into equity with changes in fair value recognized in current earnings. At September 30, 2015, the Company had convertible debt and warrants to purchase common stock. The fair value of the warrants is classified as a liability. Some of these units have embedded conversion features that are treated as a discount on the notes. Such financial instruments are initially recorded at fair value and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Inputs used in the valuation to derive fair value are classified based on a fair value hierarchy which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter. The Company’s derivative liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company classifies the fair value of these convertible notes and warrants derivative liability under level three. The Company’s settlement payable is measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on the most recent settlement offer. The Company classifies the fair value of the settlement payable under level three. The Company’s rescission liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on the most recent stock price. The Company classifies the fair value of the rescission liability under level one.

Based on ASC Topic 815 and related guidance, the Company concluded the common stock purchase warrants are required to be accounted for as derivatives as of the issue date due to a reset feature on the exercise price. At the date of issuance warrant derivative liabilities were measured at fair value using either quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or other valuation techniques. The Company records the fair value of these derivatives on its balance sheet at fair value with changes in the values of these derivatives reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as “Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities.” These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-10 and are disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities.

The following table presents liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of September 30, 2015 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)
Derivatives	$	-	$	-		133,850	$	35,420
Fair Value at September 30, 2015	$	-	$	-		133,850	$	35,420

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

Note 9 - Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share.

On January 31, 2014, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Article of Incorporation of the Company with the Nevada Secretary of State, the Company increased its authorized share capital to 125,000,000 shares consisting of 120,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share and effectuated a 10 for 1 stock split.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the ten-for-one (1:10) Forward Stock Split.

Common Stock

Common Shares Issued Cash

On May 12, 2015 the Company sold 348,837 shares of its common stock at $0.43 per share for $150,000 in cash.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

On January 28, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (“Consulting Agreement”) with a third party (the “Consultant”) for software development consulting services. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, the Consultant agrees to provide consulting services for Nine months in exchange for 40,000 shares of common stock of the Company per month.

For the Nine months ended September 30, 2015 the Company recorded $106,976, which were valued at the close price of the Company’s common stock on the last day of each month for each 40,000 shares issued or 240,000 shares in aggregate issued to the Consultant.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for shareholders' equity comprised of portions attributable to the parent entity and noncontrolling interest, including other comprehensive income. Includes, but is not limited to, balances of common stock, preferred stock, additional paid-in capital, other capital and retained earnings, accumulated balance for each classification of other comprehensive income and amount of comprehensive income.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)

-Number Topic 4

-Section C

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)

-Number Topic 4

-Section E

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 235

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 1

-Subparagraph (SX 210.4-08.(d),(e))

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=26873400&loc=d3e23780-122690

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 4

-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 4.C)

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187143-122770

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 210

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 1

-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.29-31)

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Glossary Preferred Stock

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6521494

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 1

-Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04)

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 2

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21463-112644

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 5

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21488-112644

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 11

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21564-112644

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 4

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21484-112644

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 3

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21475-112644

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 30

-Section 50

-Paragraph 2

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6405834&loc=d3e23285-112656

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 505

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 6

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6928386&loc=d3e21506-112644

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 310

-SubTopic 10

-Section S99

-Paragraph 2

-Subparagraph (SAB TOPIC 4.E)

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27010918&loc=d3e74512-122707

+ Details

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

Note 10 - Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were some reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed as follows:

On November 12, 2015, the Company amended the SPA it entered into with Glamis to limit the amount Glamis is obligated to advance to the Company under the Glamis Note to $135,000 and amend the Note to reflect a principal balance of $135,000 after giving effect to an August 24, 2015 payment by Glamis to the Company of $65,000 under the Note. No further advances will be made by Glamis to the Company under the Note.

On November 10, 2015, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Pixorial, Inc. (the “Seller”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase, and the Seller agreed to sell, Pixorial’s assets (the “Pixorial Asset Acquisition”), which are comprised of source code, software, trade secrets, processes, ideas, know-how, improvements, discoveries, developments, designs, techniques and contract rights related to the Pixorial app, including but not limited to contract rights related to the Pixorial app for inclusion on the Apple store and the Google Play store. Pixorial’s software offers online user-friendly tools and applications to access, download, edit, tag, process, store, organize and share videos, photos and music from any device, services which we plan to integrate with our existing software.

Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue 3,200,000 shares of its unregistered common stock to the existing shareholders and certain creditors of Pixorial, and, pending the closing, to enter into a consulting agreement with Andres Espineira (the “Espineira Consulting Agreement”), Pixorial’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, the duration of which will be 40 months from the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Espineira Consulting Agreement, Mr. Espineira will be responsible for leading the integration team that will be engaged in the development of the enhancements to the Company’s existing life-logging software tools by incorporating the tools developed by Pixorial. The Espineira Consulting Agreement provides for the Company’s payment to him of $8,000 per month and awards him stock options to acquire 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at the market price of the common stock as of October 31, 2015, one-third the number of which may be sold beginning as of each of the first three anniversaries of November 1, 2015. The shares to be issued to Pixorial’s shareholders will also be subject to a lock-up agreement whereby one-third the number received by each may be sold beginning as of each of the first three anniversaries of the closing of the Pixorial Asset Acquistion.

Additionally, under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company and Pixorial have entered into a licensing agreement effective as of November 1, 2015 (the “Pixorial License Agreement”) whereby the Company has licensed the exclusive use of certain of Pixorial’s software, source code, software, trade secrets, processes, ideas, know-how, improvements, discoveries, developments, designs, techniques and contract rights related to the Licensor’s Pixorial app (the “Pixorial Software”). The duration of the Pixorial License Agreement is the earlier of twelve months or the closing of the transactions under the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Consummation of the Pixorial Asset Acquisition is subject to certain conditions and is expected to be closed no later than March 31, 2016.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Valuation of Derivatives

Valuation of Derivatives

Cash Equivalents

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Furniture and Fixture

Furniture and Fixtures

Estimated

Useful Life

(Years)

Furniture and fixture

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Related Parties

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and contingencies

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

a.	The exercise price of the option.

b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

c.	The current price of the underlying share.

d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.

e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Research and Development

Research and Development

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions

Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions

The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per Share

There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the reporting year ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

Cash Flows Reporting

Cash Flows Reporting

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

1.	Identify the contract(s) with the customer

2.	Identify the performance obligations in the contract

3.	Determine the transaction price

4.	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

5.	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

1.	Contracts with customers - including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

2.	Significant judgments and changes in judgments - determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations.

3.	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)

b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

●	Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.

●	Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).

●	Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.

●	Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.

●	Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule of Furniture and Fixture Estimated Useful Life

Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

Estimated

Useful Life

(Years)

Furniture and fixture

Derivative Liability (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Derivative Instrument Detail [Abstract]

Summary of Warrants Derivative Liabilities Activity

The following table summarizes the warrant liabilities derivative activity for the period ending September 30, 2015:

Description	Warrant Liabilities
Fair value at June 30, 2015	$	-
Change due to Issuances		169,270
Change due to Exercise/Conversion		-
Change in Fair Value		(35,420	)
Fair value at September 30, 2015	$	133,850

Schedule of Warrants Issued with Assumptions

The lattice methodology was used to value the warrants issued, with the following assumptions.

Assumptions	September 30, 2015
Dividend yield		0.00	%
Risk-free rate for term		1.37	%
Volatility		106.4	%
Maturity dates		4.9 years
Stock Price		0.2125

Convertible Debt (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Convertible Debt Analysis

Following is an analysis of convertible debt due Old Main Capital at September 30, 2015:

	September 30, 2015
Contractual balance	$	273,684
Less unamortized discount		(257,223	)

Convertible debt	$	16,451

Related Party Transactions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions Tables

Schedule of Consulting Services Provided by the Officer

Consulting services provided by the officer for the period from the Nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2015		For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2014

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer	$	94,727	$	96,385	*

Chief Product Officer		75,000		-
	$	169,727	$	96,385

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Disclosure Text Block [Abstract]

Schedule of Fair Value of Liabilities

The following table presents liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of September 30, 2015 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)
Derivatives	$	-	$	-		133,850	$	35,420
Fair Value at September 30, 2015	$	-	$	-		133,850	$	35,420

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Narrative)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Narrative) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 0		$ 0
Percentage of likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement	greater than fifty percent (50%)
Dilutive shares outstanding	$ 0	$ 0

- Definition

The amount of net income (loss) for the period available to each share of common stock or common unit outstanding during the reporting period and to each share or unit that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares or units for all dilutive potential common shares or units outstanding during the reporting period.

+ References+ Details

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Schedule of Furniture and Fixture Estimated Useful Life (Details)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Schedule of Furniture and Fixture Estimated Useful Life (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Furniture and Fixture Estimated Useful Life	7 years

Note Payable (Details Narrative)

Note Payable (Details Narrative) (Securities Purchase Agreement [Member], Glamis Capital SA [Member], USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Aug. 24, 2015	Jul. 20, 2015
Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] \| Glamis Capital SA [Member]
Securities purchase amount		$ 200,000
Note payable principal amount		200,000
Note payable bear interest rate		10.00%
Note payable bear interest rate until it is paid		14.00%
Repayment of note payable	65,000	70,000
Future financing minimum amount on debt		$ 1,000,000

Derivative Liability (Details Narrative)

Derivative Liability (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
Derivative Liability (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Change in fair value of derivatives	$ 35,420		$ 35,420	$ 0
Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] \| Investor [Member]
Number of warrants issued during period	850,000		850,000
Warrants exercise price per share	$ 0.2625		$ 0.2625
Warrants term			5 years
Fair value of derivative liabilities related to warrants issued			$ 169,270

Derivative Liability - Summary of Warrants Derivative Liabilities Activity (Details)

Derivative Liability - Summary of Warrants Derivative Liabilities Activity (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Liability - Summary Of Warrants Derivative Liabilities Activity Details
Warrants Liabilities Fair value Beginning Balance
Change due to Issuances			169,270
Change due to Exercise/Conversion
Change in Fair Value	(35,420)		(35,420)	0
Warrants Liabilities Fair value Ending Balance	$ 133,850		$ 133,850

- Definition

Fair value, after the effects of master netting arrangements, of a financial liability or contract with one or more underlyings, notional amount or payment provision or both, and the contract can be net settled by means outside the contract or delivery of an asset, expected to be settled within one year or normal operating cycle, if longer. Includes assets not subject to a master netting arrangement and not elected to be offset.

+ References+ Details

Derivative Liability - Schedule of Warrants Issued with Assumptions (Details)

Derivative Liability - Schedule of Warrants Issued with Assumptions (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Derivative Liability - Schedule Of Warrants Issued With Assumptions Details
Dividend yield	0.00%
Risk-free rate for term	1.37%
Volatility	106.40%
Maturity dates	4 years 10 months 24 days
Stock Price	$ 0.2125

Convertible Debt (Details Narrative)

Convertible Debt (Details Narrative) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	0 Months Ended
Convertible Debt (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 14, 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Old Main Capital, LLC [Member]	Sep. 08, 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Old Main Capital, LLC [Member]	Sep. 14, 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Old Main Capital, LLC [Member] Within 30 days after Issuance Date [Member]
Securities purchase amount		$ 450,000
Convertible debt payable principal amount		473,864
Convertible debt original issue discount	257,223	23,864
Convertible debt payable bear interest rate		10.00%
Repayment of convertible debt		250,000		200,000
Convertible debt payable bear interest rate until it is paid		24.00%
Convertible debt maturity date		Sep. 08, 2016
Convertible debt weekly payment		25,000
Convertible debt average of lowest VWAP of Common Stock		52.00%	70.00%
Percentage of prepayment price of multiplied outstanding principal and interest		125.00%
Percentage of redemption price of multiplied by outstanding principal and interest		130.00%
Number of common stock shares issued for purchase of warrants		850,000
Warrants term		5 years
Debt beneficial conversion feature	$ 80,730	$ 273,684

Convertible Debt - Schedule of Convertible Debt Analysis (Details)

Convertible Debt - Schedule of Convertible Debt Analysis (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2015
Convertible Debt - Schedule Of Convertible Debt Analysis Details
Contractual balance	$ 273,684
Less unamortized discount	(257,223)
Convertible debt	$ 16,451

- Definition

The amount of debt discount (net of debt premium) that was originally recognized at the issuance of the instrument that has yet to be amortized.

+ References+ Details

Related Party Transactions - Summary of Consulting Services Provided by the Officer (Details)

Related Party Transactions - Summary of Consulting Services Provided by the Officer (Details) (USD $)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Sep. 30, 2014

Consulting services from officer

$ 169,727

$ 96,385

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer [Member]

Consulting services from officer

94,727

^[1]

96,385

Chief Product Officer [Member]

Consulting services from officer

$ 75,000

[1]	During the nine month period ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, $0 and $9,425 of these consulting services was recognized in cost of revenues, respectively.

Related Party Transactions - Summary of Consulting Services Provided by the Officer (Details) (Parenthetical)

Related Party Transactions - Summary of Consulting Services Provided by the Officer (Details) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Consulting services		$ 9,425

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Schedule of Fair Value of Liabilities (Details)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Schedule of Fair Value of Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Fair value of derivatives	$ 35,420		$ 35,420	$ 0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Fair value of derivatives
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Fair value of derivatives
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Fair value of derivatives			$ 133,850

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Details Narrative)

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended				0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	May 12, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014	Jun. 05, 2012	Jan. 28, 2015 Consulting Agreement [Member]	Sep. 30, 2015 Consulting Agreement [Member]
Common stock, shares authorized		120,000,000		120,000,000	75,000,000
Authorized shares capital		125,000,000
Common stock, par value		$ 0.001		$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized		5,000,000		5,000,000
Preferred stock, par value		$ 0.001		$ 0.001
Forward stock split			(1:10) Forward Stock Split.
Number of common stock shares sold	348,837
Common stock price per share	$ 0.43	$ 0.43		$ 0.60
Number of common stock value sold	$ 150,000
Issuance of common stock for services		$ 106,976					$ 106,976
Issuance of common stock shares for services						40,000	240,000

Subsequent Events (Details Narrative)

Subsequent Events (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
Subsequent Events (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Aug. 24, 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Glamis Capital SA [Member]	Jul. 20, 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Glamis Capital SA [Member]	Nov. 12, 2015 Subsequent Event [Member] Securities Purchase Agreement [Member] Glamis Capital SA [Member]	Nov. 10, 2015 Subsequent Event [Member] Asset Purchase Agreement [Member] Pixorial [Member]
Securities purchase amount		$ 200,000	$ 135,000
Convertible debt payable principal amount		200,000	135,000
Repayment of note payable	65,000	70,000
Number of common stock shares issued				3,200,000
Payment of stock options				$ 8,000
Number of stock option acquire for common stock shares				6,000,000